Comments (4)

1. 

   black_birds2000 said on June 29, 2009, 1:19 pm

   FIRST OF ALL MUST TELL U INDIANS THAT,STATEMENT 'HOW GHAMBHIR CAME TO AFRIDI'S RESCUE' IS NOTHING BUT A AS USUAL RUBBISH.OUR HONEST MEDIA HAS CONFERMED THAT AFRIDI DIDNT TALKED TO HIM ALL THE WORLD CUP. OUR HERO WAS GIVING A INTERVIEW TO EXPRESS 24/7 N CUNFERMED THAT HE NEVER ASKED ANYTHING FROM HIM OR FROM ANYONE ELSE.HE JUST DID WHAT WAS REQUIRED. IN A ANSWER TO A QUESTION HE SAID I DIDNT MEET WITH INDIAN PLAYERS THIS TIME DUE TO SOME OF HIS BUSY TRAINING SESSIONS HE HAD RIGHT THROUGH THE CUP

   Report as spam...

   ---

2. 

   bulususomayajulu said on June 26, 2009, 2:16 am

   the inian team is much below the internationalstandard, exceppt for yuvrajsingh,there is no fielder worth mentioning. if the bowlers hose to attack catches should beheld, unles we give 25vruns due to fieling erors ,and since the running betwen wickets is no where near the interatohenoramal way ,e lose 25 runs. thus weloose 50 runs even before aballis bowlled in the match. our wins comeas afluke for the batsmen rely more on boundaries and bowlers have to bowl semidefensively or semi atacking,these comments are aharsh reality,thouhgh i am not even agully cricketer,we shol have likes of ajayjaeja,robinsinhss,mohdazharudin,abbasalibaig, chnduborde,and shrewd captians who can thinkten steps ahed along with naturalinstincts like ravisastry,ashokmakd,pollyumrigar,.our wins are only omcein 20to 30 matches , ourwins are mostly achieved dueto non performance by other than that of or ownstrengh.for we have noear talent or clas in any dicipline of the game. iam watchin cricket from 1964 to 2009,from patudi to dhoni,the resultsnd commentsoed not substantially chage.inthe 50and70,the winninwas once in abluemoon,now the frequency of winnigha ben improved considerably ,but the fact remains thatoyrfielding and runig between wickets has to be improvd considerably sothat if opposiition scores20150 to 200,they cnbe confientofwinningandsetasatarget to 275 -30,theother ccricketing countries ar not afraid of achieving the the target. we have abattincoach,bowlinn coch,fielding coach,now we should avise borad to introduce winning coach.the staticians from209eries also recor no of dropped catches, theboar should reduce apercentage oof match fee,andfor slii runouts,that not keeping the baton ground,aconsiderable amount of match fes shold be withheld. if an outstanding innings or bowlingfeat, orbrilant fielnding,theplayers concerned shoul berewarded. since now contact system exists,the renewalof cotract for clasification of players ,the performance should only count. of late it s se n from theall the players go off the field at one timeor he other,which wasnot the practice before theyear2000.an indian coach owiil be able to deliver better results for the computers cannot perform on the field.

   Report as spam...

   ---

3. 

   bulususomayajulu said on June 26, 2009, 2:16 am

   the inian team is much below the internationalstandard, exceppt for yuvrajsingh,there is no fielder worth mentioning. if the bowlers hose to attack catches should beheld, unles we give 25vruns due to fieling erors ,and since the running betwen wickets is no where near the interatohenoramal way ,e lose 25 runs. thus weloose 50 runs even before aballis bowlled in the match. our wins comeas afluke for the batsmen rely more on boundaries and bowlers have to bowl semidefensively or semi atacking,these comments are aharsh reality,thouhgh i am not even agully cricketer,we shol have likes of ajayjaeja,robinsinhss,mohdazharudin,abbasalibaig, chnduborde,and shrewd captians who can thinkten steps ahed along with naturalinstincts like ravisastry,ashokmakd,pollyumrigar,.our wins are only omcein 20to 30 matches , ourwins are mostly achieved dueto non performance by other than that of or ownstrengh.for we have noear talent or clas in any dicipline of the game. iam watchin cricket from 1964 to 2009,from patudi to dhoni,the resultsnd commentsoed not substantially chage.inthe 50and70,the winninwas once in abluemoon,now the frequency of winnigha ben improved considerably ,but the fact remains thatoyrfielding and runig between wickets has to be improvd considerably sothat if opposiition scores20150 to 200,they cnbe confientofwinningandsetasatarget to 275 -30,theother ccricketing countries ar not afraid of achieving the the target. we have abattincoach,bowlinn coch,fielding coach,now we should avise borad to introduce winning coach.the staticians from209eries also recor no of dropped catches, theboar should reduce apercentage oof match fee,andfor slii runouts,that not keeping the baton ground,aconsiderable amount of match fes shold be withheld. if an outstanding innings or bowlingfeat, orbrilant fielnding,theplayers concerned shoul berewarded. since now contact system exists,the renewalof cotract for clasification of players ,the performance should only count. of late it s se n from theall the players go off the field at one timeor he other,which wasnot the practice before theyear2000.an indian coach owiil be able to deliver better results for the computers cannot perform on the field.

   Report as spam...

   ---

4. 

   imizia@ymail.com said on June 25, 2009, 2:28 pm

   India has very little chance in absence of Zeheer Khan, who played vital role in most wins in recent past, therefore in first PP indian bowlers may be struggling, Ishant Sharma may do something therefore he must be given new ball, but he has to vary length on WI pitches, India must look for replacement of Kumble the legend spinner as his absence denting indian bowling strength, ICC T20 show that Batting Power House can't win matches on its own and you need atleast three good bowlers.

   Report as spam...

   ---